// claim dossier
SUPPORTED100% confidence
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was gutted by the Supreme Court, leading to swift changes in Southern states.
320,699 views were told this
// The record

The Supreme Court's 2013 decision in *Shelby County v. Holder* invalidated the formula used to determine which jurisdictions were subject to federal preclearance under the Voting Rights Act, and the 2026 ruling in *Louisiana v. Callais* further restricted the Act's enforceability.

Why

The claim accurately reflects both the long-term impact of *Shelby County v. Holder*, which effectively ended federal preclearance for voting law changes, and the widespread legal and media assessment that the 2026 *Louisiana v. Callais* decision further curtailed the Voting Rights Act's protections against discriminatory redistricting.

Judged as of Jul 2, 2026— the video's publish date

// Receipts
// Who's saying it
// Topics
// Related claims
SUPPORTED
The Supreme Court allowed the President to fire members of independent agencies in 2026.

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled in *Trump v. Slaughter* that the President has the authority to remove members of independent agencies at will, effectively overruling the 1935 precedent of *Humphrey's Executor v. United States*.

320,699 views were told this
SUPPORTED
The Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act of 1965, leading to rapid changes in states, particularly in the South, in 2026.

In its April 29, 2026, decision in *Louisiana v. Callais*, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that a congressional map containing a second majority-Black district was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, a move widely characterized by legal scholars and civil rights groups as effectively gutting or evis

320,699 views were told this
SUPPORTED
The Supreme Court ruled in 2026 that the president could fire members of independent agencies.

In the June 2026 decision *Trump v. Slaughter*, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the president has the authority to remove heads of independent federal agencies without cause, effectively overruling the 1935 precedent *Humphrey's Executor v. United States* for those agencies, though it separately de

320,699 views were told this